The Public Interest

So much for “scarce resources”

Stephen Moore

Winter 1992

IN 1980 THE well-known environmentalist Paul Ehrlich bet his philosophical adversary, the economist Julian Simon, $1,000 that in a decade five resources of Ehrlich’s choosing would have higher prices. Ehrlich chose copper, chrome, nickel, tin, and tungsten. All five resources declined in price and Ehrlich lost the highly publicized bet, recently chronicled in the New York Times Magazine. Some concluded that Ehrlich simply chose poorly.

Download a PDF of the full article.

Download

Insight

from the

Archives

A weekly newsletter with free essays from past issues of National Affairs and The Public Interest that shed light on the week's pressing issues.

advertisement

Sign-in to your National Affairs subscriber account.


Already a subscriber? Activate your account.


subscribe

Unlimited access to intelligent essays on the nation’s affairs.

SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe to National Affairs.